Gaps & Silences
Who? Pierre Macherey
When? 1966 - onwards
What?
This page follows from some of the ideas on Discourse
discussed elsewhere. There are a number of ways of interpreting the gaps and
silences that we find in a text. This depends on whether we believe that they
are intentional on the part of the author or unintentional.
Unintentional Gaps:
Many writers are not worried about post-modern ideas of
uncertainty and unreliability. They just want to write a realistic, good story
that sends out a certain message about the world. However, as we have seen from
our discussion on Discourse, no one has an unbiased and completely pure view of
the world. We all, to a greater or lesser extent, have been affected by the
society that we have been brought up in. In growing up, we have had to accept a
set of rules, or a discourse, that everyone else in our society shares. This
set of rules tells us what is right or wrong, true or false, sane or mad and it
affects how we see or judge the world.
Here is a simple example of how using a different set of
rules can affect how we see or judge the world. Imagine that during a football
match one player suddenly picks up the ball runs past the other team deep into
their half and scores a goal. If we judge this action using the rules of soccer
the player has broken the rules and the goal won’t count. However, if we judge
this action using the rules of American football the player will have scored a
perfectly legal touch down. This example does not seem very convincing because
we are aware of both sets of rules and can switch between them depending upon
what game we wish to play. The problem with a discourse, however, is that we
are often not aware that our society even has a set of rules because we follow
them so naturally and unconsciously and because of this we do not have the
freedom to switch from one set of rules to another. In a sense we’re stuck with
our discourse, with the game that we are playing, our one way of viewing the
world.
This presents a problem when trying to write. An author will
write about the world as he or she sees it. However, the view that any author
has of the world is not how the world really is. Instead it is the world seen
through the filter of their discourse, through their set of rules. As such the
story they write will not be able to represent the world fully and when the
writer comes across part of the world that does not fit with his or her
ideology they will be forced to leave a gap, silence or contradiction in their
text. At this point their story will break down or stutter. By examining these
gaps, silences and contradictions, these stutterings,
we can see how the world the writer is trying to create is different to the way
the world really is and from this we can try to figure out the rules of their
Discourse.
A good example of this can be seen when we examine the ‘nice
guys eventually come good’ discourse in our society. This is clearly an
assumption, bias or prejudice because the world is full of evil people who have
achieved power success and fame and there are also lots of good people who have
been rewarded with nothing. However, the myth of the good guy eventually winning
the day is a favourite one and can easily be found in literature and movies. Take
Harry Potter for example. At Hogwarts Harry is usually a fairly poor wizard,
his spells don’t often work and he is clearly an inferior wizard to Hermione.
However, when it comes to the crunch and Harry has to cast an incredibly
powerful spell, pull off a complex broomstick trick or duel the evil Lord Voldemort (a wizard far more experienced and more ruthless
than he) he always manages to do it. Rowling has to make Harry seem like a
feeble wizard so that he qualifies as a nice guy who we will sympathise with
but then she also needs him to defeat the baddies so that he can be a hero. The
contradiction between Harry’s usual ineptitude and sudden brilliance when
necessary is a clear example of a gap or silence within the text and it is a
contradiction that we accept because we have bought into the ‘nice guys
eventually come first’ discourse that our society propagates.
Intentional Gaps:
Many modern writers, however, tend to be aware of all these
theories about discourse and post-structuralism and how you can never really
represent the world as it truly is; how everyone is going to interpret a story
differently and how we are doomed to a life of uncertainty and ambiguity. As
such, some writers respond to this by actually including this idea in their
writing. The use of intentional gaps and silences, in this way, may be seen as
a post-modern, ironic, depressing awareness of the fact that we can never be
certain of anything.
More interestingly, it may be an attempt to allow the reader
more freedom to interpret the text and to make explicit the reader’s role in
constructing the story and filling in the gaps.
Finally, specifically in the case of Marquez, the gaps and
silences in his novel may be an expression of the magical realist idea that you
cannot reduce reality down to a series of factual nuts and bolts; that we
shouldn’t always try to make sense of things ‘logically’ and ‘rationally’ and
that perhaps some of the beauty of life lies in its mystery and its
inexplicability and that perhaps we should just sit back and accept that rather
than trying to look for reasons for everything.