A View from the Bridge
Major themes
Justice & The Law:
Summary:
Miller presents at least two, possibly three or four,
different conceptions of the inter-related notions of law, justice and honour to
us in the play. On the one hand, Alfieri represents the letter of the law. The
law as it is written down in books and the law that is used by the
The second important form of justice is one that cannot be
found in books and it is championed principally by Marco. Marco believes that
it is his duty to exact revenge upon Eddie for the way in which he degraded his
brother and betrayed his family. When he says that ‘in my country [Eddie] would
be dead now.’ what he is really saying is that Eddie should be dead by
now and that although Eddie has acted legally according to the laws of the
Eddie also demonstrates a further conception of justice,
which we might call moral justice, when he visits Alfieri in order to prevent Rodolpho from ‘stealing’ Catherine away. Although Eddie’s
reasoning is twisted by his unconscious sexual desire for Catherine there is a
shred of justification to his thoughts. If Eddie were right, and if Rodolpho
really were marrying Catherine simply for a passport then this would be an
immoral / unjust act on Rodolpho’s part and, once
again we find, Alfieri’s law of books unable to do anything to punish Rodolpho or prevent his actions. Indeed, Alfieri explicitly
says ‘You have no recourse in the law, Eddie.’ This form of justice may, on
closer examination, be mostly similar to Marco’s more natural conception of
justice above.
Finally, there is a code of street conduct that appears
briefly, for example when Louis and Mike are forced to refrain from openly
questioning Rodolpho’s sexuality because they know
that ‘they have to see [Eddie] if they make a crack.’ Once again, this is
broadly similar to Marco’s naturalistic conception of justice.
Quotations:
Page No |
Quotation |
Explanation |
12 |
Alfieri introduces Red Hook with the comment that ‘There
were many here who were justly shot by unjust men.’ which is, in some ways a
reversal of what happens in this play. At least according to |
|
23 |
Vinny |
|
66 |
Alfieri explains to Eddie ‘The law is nature. The law is
only a word for what has a right to happen.’ |
|
75 |
‘Marco spits in Eddies face.’ and Eddie shouts ‘I don’t
forget that, Marco! You hear what I’m sayin’?’ |
|
78 |
Marco responds to Alfieri’s request that he not kill Eddie
by saying that ‘He knows that such a promise is dishonourable.’ Alfieri
however believes that ‘To promise not to kill is not dishonourable.’ This
seems to be ‘a new idea’ to Marco but he is dissatisfied that with the rest
of Alfieri’s answer that ‘Nothing’ will happen to Eddie if he obeys the law
and he concludes that ‘I don’t understand this country.’ |
|
79 |
Marco argues that ‘All the law is not in a book’ but
Alfieri responds ‘Yes. In a book. There is no other law.’ However he later
admits ‘This is not God Marco … Only God makes justice.’ |
|
82 |
Eddie explains his desire to fight with Marco by saying ‘I
want my name! … Marco’s got my name and … he’s gonna
give it back to me in front of this neighbourhood, or we have it out.’ |
|
83 |
Eddie believes that he has helped out these complete
strangers ‘Like in the Bible.’ but that in return they have ‘come out of the
water and grab[bed] a girl for a passport’ and ‘take[n] from [their] own
family like from the stable.’ |
|
84 |
Eddie accuses Marco of ‘Wipin’
the neighbourhood with my name like a dirty rag! I want my name, Marco. Now gimme my name and we go together to the wedding.’ |
|
85 |
Alfieri ends by admitting that his version of legality is
limited and that ‘The truth is holy’ |
|