The Wasteland – Section
Notes: Part V ‘What the Thunder Said’
Summary:
This is the final part of
the ‘Wasteland’ and therefore, despite destruction and desperation,
there is the emergence of images of hope and salvation through the arrival of
water.
The structure remains
fragmented and irregular thereby depicting the fragmentation of society.
Motifs and Connotations:
Desert, Thirst – the need for Salvation
Water – the source of salvation
Fire – destruction vs. purity
Nature
‘If
there were the sound of water only
Not
the cicada
And
dry grass singing
But
sound of water over a rock’
This
therefore indicates that nature was viewed as a negative symbol as a result of
the absence of water.
‘Who
are those hooded hordes swarming
Over
endless plains, stumbling in cracked earth
Ringed
by the flat horizon only’
Therefore,
Eliot dehumanises society by assigning them animal traits thus emphasising the
lack of direction, purpose and goals of individuals within society. The
‘endless plains’ and ‘cracked earth’ refer to the desiccation of nature and
further highlight society’s need for a saviour. These images of nature are
contrasted with the references to cities; however both the cities and nature
are seen to be in the midst of destruction.
Themes:
Death- destruction of humanity
Hope
Religion as a form of salvation
Imagery:
“- He who was living is
now dead”, “We who were living is now dying”
Clear imagery of death
and the enjambment gives a sense of continuation so it seems that death is
imminent. Use of the pronoun ‘we’ enhances the imagery, dragging the reader
into Eliot’s morose thoughts having a larger effect than if a more distant
stance was used.
“dry sterile thunder without rain”
Lack of
water symbolizes a lack of hope focusing on the motif as a way of rebirth like
in death by water. Thunder is a fusion of both fire and water both of which are
motifs that symbolize hope in some shape or form, death by water and rebirth
through fire (see Dante’s inferno later); sterile thunder is a denial of both
motifs, it’s a denial of hope and even of the negative aspects of both motifs
leading to an emptiness which is reflected in the third part of the wasteland.
“cracks
and reforms and bursts in the violet air” “falling towers” “
The violet air could be a
reference to twilight, the ending of civilisation, the physical signs of
destruction of civilisation like the cracks and reforms and especially the
imagery of the falling towers. The list of destroyed cities followed directly
by those of the modern world serves only to remind the reader of oncoming doom
and forewarn them of the destruction of society.
“Only a cock stood on the
rooftree”
A reference to the night
before the crucifixion of Christ, signifies both the
highest point and lowest point, Christ will die but we will be saved. Through
this image we are given a sense of hope tinted with the darkness of death; it
seems like an amalgamation of both what Eliot desires for us as a civilisation,
to be saved, and what he fears- what we have to give up before we are saved.
“Poi s’acose nel foco che gli
affina”
(then he hid himself in the fire that purifies him)
Fire, destructionà purity
This is a reference to
Dante’s inferno; his journey through Hell to Heaven, this is an allusion with
an hopeful tone- just like what Eliot sees our society having to go through
hell before we reach heaven.
“Rock and no water and
the sandy road”
Religious imagery of red
rock, stony; its an allusion to Ezekiel and forms part
of a motif linked to Part 1. Ezekiel in biblical scripture is the Messiah in
the first part it can be said that Eliot is prophesising the doom of society
yet he consciously denies the role of the Messiah for the conclusion of The
Wasteland.
“And bats with baby faces-”, “And crawled head downward down a
blackened wall”
Vampiric imagery of
darkness and the corrupting influence of darkness on innocence of babies.
Vampires symbolise are antithesis of God, humans who gave their souls over to
the devil, Eliot uses their darkness to illustrate the destruction of humanity
or to forewarn of the oncoming darkness.
“There is the empty chapel,
only the wind’s home”
Eliot does not believe in
organised religion but rather in spirituality; believes that they cannot
provide salvation, hence the imagery of an empty chapel. Empty chapel
demonstrates again the materialism of our society, on the outside we see a
chapel and immediately associate it with religion and think of it as a form of
salvation never actually looking within it to find its meaning.
Characters:
Although it is apparent
that there are few characters present within ‘The Wasteland’, it is evident
that Eliot is expressing his views through the narrator, a character who is
ubiquitous throughout the poem. The narrator is seen to explain the different
interpretations – ‘Datta’, ‘Dayadhvam’ and ‘Damyata’
– of ‘What the Thunder Said’. Despite indicating relatively hopeless images and
alluding to the fact that we have a limited existence and we are imprisoning
ourselves; the narrator concludes on a relatively positive image of hope as it
is apparent that we have found guidance as a result of the ‘controlling hands’.
However, alternatively this could be interpreted as restrictive and entrapping
thus prohibiting freedoms.
Moreover, the narrator is
present within the final ten and a half lines of the poem:
I
sat upon the shore
Fishing,
with the arid plain behind me
Shall
I at least set my lands in order?
Poi
s'ascose nel foco che gli
affina
Quando fiam uti chelidon--O swallow swallow
Le
Prince d'Aquitaine à la tour abolie
These
fragments I have shored against
my ruins
Why
then Ile fit you. Hieronymo's mad againe.
Datta. Dayadhvam. Damyata.
Shantih shantih shantih
Therefore within these
final lines, the narrator offers society a degree of hope as it ends on a final
peaceful note of ‘Shantih shantih
shantih’. The allusion to the legend of the Fisher
King indicates that the narrator, in addition to society, has succumbed to
temptation and thus the lands over which they preside have become a
‘Wasteland’. Furthermore, this legend provides society with a degree of hope,
due to the fact that through purification and by not giving into temptation,
society can be restored to its former glory. Moreover, the phrase ‘Why then Ile
fit you’ indicates that the narrator will do what is whished by society.
A change in speaker is
evident in the stanza:
Who
is the third who walks always beside you?
When
I count, there are only you and I together
But
when I look ahead up the white road
There
is always another one walking beside you
Gliding
wrapt in a brown mantle, hooded
I
do not know whether a man or a woman
--But
who is that on the other side of you?
It is clear that the
speaker is not the same narrator present throughout the remainder of the poem.
It has been argued that the speaker is Eliot’s former wife and therefore it is
an allusion to Eliot’s relationship with his friend who died in Gallipoli
during World War I. Through this interpretation, it is apparent that Eliot’s
wife discovered this relationship and thus always felt that there was ‘always
another one walking beside’ Eliot, and, although she may not have been able to
ascertain the identity of this person, as it is stated ‘When I count there are
only you and I together’ and ‘--But who is that on the other side of
you’, she could feel his/her presence.
Alternatively, this could
be interpreted as the narrator addressing the reader in order to express the
presence of a degree of hope. The image of the ‘third who walks always beside
you’ could be interpreted as a benign image, Jesus, or furthermore an allusion
to Shackleton’s Antarctic Expedition. Nevertheless it
is apparent that these images of accompaniment promote endurance and give
guidance and hope.
In addition, a new
character emerges in the form of God expressing his views through the word
‘DA’; hence the reader is able to hear ‘What the Thunder Said’. It is apparent
that the voice of thunder and the character of God provides hope to the men,
devils and Gods and allows them to ascertain what is needed in order to achieve
inner piece. Therefore, the character of God provides society with guidance and
hope.
Setting:
Within ‘What the Thunder
Said’ a movement between settings is evident. The first three stanzas refer to
a desolate and desert setting in which there is an absence of water and a need
for salvation. This setting thereby epitomises Eliot’s ideas regarding a
physical wasteland and thus emphasises the dire need of society for salvation.
Furthermore the reference to ‘falling towers’ and ‘unreal cities’ indicates the
destruction of the symbols of materialism and corruption evident within
society. Moreover, there is a transition to an absence of a real setting when
Eliot simply refers to people and society without naming a particular setting. This
depicts that Eliot’s views transcend any physical setting and are instead universal
and ubiquitous within society. These views apply to each individual and
therefore each individual has a responsibility to act in a manner by which to
counter the wasteland that society has become. In addition, it is evident that
Eliot is able to view and comprehend society in a way that is currently beyond
our reach. The setting once again shifts with the line ‘I sat upon the shore’.
From this point forward there is once again the absence of a physical setting;
however it is apparent that the narrator and the setting have moved to be
within the legend of the Fisher King. The transition to the setting of the
Fisher King allows the parallels between the legend and the ‘Wasteland’ to
become clear and thus offer the readers the hope of salvation. This legend
provides background to ‘The Wasteland’ and our failure as a result of
succumbing to temptation has resulted in the reduction of our land to a state
of desolation and can be paralleled to the Fisher King who lost the Holy Grail
as a result of yielding to desires, and, after being wounded, he was unable to
tend to his land thus causing it to become a ‘Wasteland’. However, despite the
moral lesson given by the legend of the Fisher King, an element of hope emerges
as it is apparent that through purification and not giving into temptation
society can be restored.
Relation of Part to Whole:
‘What the Thunder Said’ is
the final part of ‘The Wasteland’ and it therefore effectively completes the
conveyance of Eliot’s message regarding the wasteland that society has become
and the manner through which we should attempt to conduct the transformation
and restoration of society. Throughout the previous parts of the poem, Eliot
essentially held a mirror up to society portraying a physical, moral and
emotional wasteland, where promiscuity, materialism and corruption were rife
and there was a lack of communication and interaction between individuals.
Through this revelation, Eliot thereby prohibited society from ignoring and
disregarding the depths to which society had sunk and the ‘Wasteland’ that
prevailed.
Despite the purification
process that Phlebas the Phoenician underwent during
‘Death by Water’, Eliot continues to include references to destruction and the
thirst, restriction and desperation of the land. This thereby reminds the
reader that despite embarking upon the process of death and rebirth, this
process is not yet complete and a need for salvation remains dire. Within ‘What
the Thunder Said’, Eliot allows the emergence of rain, hence providing society
with a degree of salvation, and emphasises the purifying properties of the
elements fire and water, therefore indicating that society is no longer
tainted. However, references to the legend of the Fisher King remind us that we
have to continue this process of salvation and purification, as through
succumbing to temptation, society will revert to the ‘Wasteland’ that formerly prevailed.
Eliot indicates that
society has completed its journey from hell to heaven and the falling of