Footnote 5 – Origins of Homosexuality
(p.37)
*In his Psychoanalytic Theory of Neurosis, O. Fenichel asserts that the probability of a homosexual
orientation increases the more the male child identifies with his mother. This situation
results especially when the maternal figure is more compelling than that of the
father, or when the father is altogether absent from the family setting, as in
cases of death or divorce, or whenever the figure of the father, if in fact
present, is deemed repellent because of some serious defect, such as
alcoholism, excessive strictness or extreme violence of character. The child
has need of an adult hero to serve as a model for conduct: through
identification, the child will go on to adopt characteristic parental traits of
conduct, and even though, to a certain extent, he rebels against obeying their
demands, unconsciously he will incorporate the habits and even the quirks of
his progenitors, perpetuating the cultural traits of the society in which he
lives. Once having identified with his father, Fenichel
continues, the boy takes on a masculine view of the world, and in Occidental
society that view includes a strong component of aggressivity
– a vestige of his formerly indisputable condition of master -which helps the
male child impose his new presence. On the other hand, the boy who is already
adopting the maternal figure as a model and fails to encounter sufficiently
early some masculine figure-to check his fascination for the maternal-will be
socially ostracized because of his feminine traits, inasmuch as he fails to display
the appropriate toughness of the normal male child.
With respect to the same matter, Freud states in On
the Transformation of Instincts that within the male homosexual, the most
complete masculine attitude can at times be combined with a total sexual
inversion-understanding "masculine attitude" to include such traits
as bravery, honor, and the spirit of trial and adventure. But in his later
work, On Narcissism: an Introduction, he elaborates a theory according to which
the male homosexual would begin with a temporary maternal fixation, only to
finally identify himself as a woman. If the object of his desire should happen
to be a young boy, this is because his mother loved him, as a boy himself. Or because he would actually have wanted his mother to love him in
the same way. In other words, the object of his desire is his own image.
For Freud, then, the myths of Narcissus and Oedipus are both components of the
original conflict which lies at the core of homosexuality. But of all of Freud's
observations concerning homosexuality, this one has been most subject to
attack, the principal objection being that homosexuals whose identification is
deeply feminine seem to feel attracted to very masculine types, or to males of
a much older age. Again in the latter work, Freud talks about the development
of erotic feelings and about still other aspects of the genesis of
homosexuality. He asserts, for instance, that libido in babies is of a rather
diffuse character, and has to pass through several stages until finally
achieving the education of its impulse and managing to have it devolve upon a
person of the opposite sex with whom pleasure can be attained through genital
union. The first stage is an oral one, in which pleasure is derived solely from
mouth contacts, such as suction. Later on comes the anal stage, in which the child
derives his satisfaction from his own intestinal movements. The last and definitive
phase is the genital. Freud considers it the only mature form of sexuality, an
assertion which years later would be directly attacked by Marcuse.
The same Freud amplifies his views in Character and
Anal Eroticism, where he elaborates the following theory: certain abnormal
types of personality, whose predominant traits are avarice and an obsession
with orderliness, may be influenced by repressed anal desires. The pleasure which
they derive from the accumulation of goods can arise from the unconscious
nostalgia for the pleasure they felt when younger in retaining-a common
activity among children-their feces. On the other hand, an obsession for order
and cleanliness would have to be a compensation for the guilt which they have
felt on account of their impulse to play with feces. As for the role which anal
fixation may play in the development of homosexuality, Freud asserts that
besides the influences already enumerated-Oedipus, Narcissus--one must take
into account the fact that all of those impediments tend to interrupt the
development of the child, by bringing about affective inhibitions which cause
fixation in an anal phase, without the possibility of acceding to the final phase,
which is to say, the genital. To this assertion West
responds that homosexuals, upon feeling themselves denied an avenue leading to
normal genital relations, are forced to experiment with extra-genital erogenous
zones, and in sodomy they encounter - after progressive adjustment-a type of
mechanically direct but not exclusive form of gratification. West adds that the
male who practices sodomy is not necessarily fixated in the anal phase, just as
the heterosexual who kisses his mate is not necessarily fixated in an oral
phase. Finally, he points out that sodomy is not an exclusively
homosexual phenomenon,
since heterosexual couples also practice the same behavior, while individuals
with an "anal character" (which is to say, avaricious, obsessed with
cleanliness and order, etc.) do not necessarily feel inclined toward
homosexuality.