The Outsider: Chapter Notes – Part 1, Chapter 6
Summary:
·
Meursault wakes up with Marie both
of whom make their way to Raymond’s house because they were going to the beach
with him to spend the day with his friends who have a chalet.
·
The first sight of the Arabs appears
at the beginning of this chapter when Raymond points one of them out as “his
man” noting that the Arab had something against him.
·
After having taken a bus to the
beach, Marie and Meursault meet Raymond’s friends, Masson and his wife. There is
some small talk and Meursault reflects with surprise on the fact that he is to
be married to Marie when he sees her laughing.
·
Throughout the novel, Camus (from
Meursault’s perspective) describes situations as they are: factual, blunt and
without very much emotion. The first part of this chapter is very much the
same. They go for a swim, they sleep, swim again, eat and then go for a walk.
·
This very factual, almost impersonal
tone relies very much on the physicality of life and also in this case love.
·
Raymond, Masson and Meursault are on
the walk when they run into the Arabs from earlier on in the chapter. There is
an awkward moment where everyone waits for the other to make a move. This is
significant because it is the beginning of the ‘choices’.
·
Raymond strikes “his man” and the
fight begins although at this point Meursault merely watches the scene. One of
the Arabs draws a knife and Raymond’s arm is cut and his face slashed.
·
The Arabs run off, and the three men
return to the house where Raymond goes to the hospital and returns bandaged and
aggravated.
·
Raymond and Meursault go for another
walk along the beach until they reach the Arabs who are lying by a spring.
Again a moment of choice (as Raymond has a gun) whether to shoot the Arab or
not. The Arab runs away, so the two of
them begin to make their way back to the chalet when Meursault notices to such
a great extent the sun, the heat and these external conditions that irritate
and disturb him. Without much thought process, he walks back to the spring,
finds the Arab still there and shoots him. Only after this occurs, does he make
the actual decision to shoot the Arab four more times.
Themes:
Absurdism
vs. Existentialism
Absurdism is apparent in the motif of physical
love/marriage in the sense that he only loves her when she is relevant to that
specific moment i.e. when he notices her and the fact that marriage is not
really important. He could marry her and that would be fine, but not marrying
her would not be any less fine. Absurdism is also evident in the killing of the
Arab which seems to happen for no real reason – hence the quotations: “Whether I stayed there
or moved, it would come to the same thing” P58 and “I realized I only had to
turn round and it would be all over” P59.
On the contrary, evidence of existentialism appears when Meursault has
the choice to shoot, or not to shoot the Arab after he has taken the gun off
Raymond. “I realized at that point you could either shoot or not shoot.” (pg
57) which suggests that he has a choice to make and some control. This would
seem to be a real choice where Meursault could really define himself through his
actions as the existentialist creed suggests. However, this is undermined later
when he actually does not intentionally shoot the Arab as the quotation “the trigger
gave” suggests that the shot was more an accident than an intended action. For
Meursault, this murder is going to be one of the key actions that defines his
life and, contrary to the ideas of Existentialism, he does not seem to have
been in control at the vital moment.
The last, probably most significant evidence of Absurdism is at the
very end of the chapter “And I fired four more times at a lifeless body…” (pg
60). Again this can be interpreted from both an existential and an absurd perspective.
Existentially, the four shots can be viewed as Meursault attempting to gain
‘ownership’ of the action of shooting the Arab, an action which was initially
out of his control but which he is subsequently trying to reclaim. In contrast
the Absurdist explanation is that ‘sometimes our actions are just as arbitrary
as our accidents’. Why shoot him again? Well why not. It doesn’t have any
greater meaning to shoot or not to shoot, so why does it matter? It doesn’t. It
is just an action with no greater significance. And why four shots? Because no
number has more meaning or less meaning. It is just a number and coincidentally
that number of shots was fired.
Motifs:
Physical
Love/Marriage:
Our conventionally accepted ideals of marriage suggest that love is
constant which current runs through the lives of the lovers. However, to
Meursault, love is physical. “And just then his wife was laughing with Marie.
For the first time perhaps, I really thought I’d get married.” (pg 52) is an
example of his ‘love is now’ philosophy. Because he sees her laughing now,
because he is with her now, he loves her but at other times, when he
speaking to someone else, doing or thinking about something else he does not
love her because the love is not noticed. When he feels love towards her (when
he is with her physically), he notices it, but when he doesn’t feel love, it
simply does not matter.
This is further exemplified in the line: “I got up straight away
because I was hungry, but Marie told me I hadn’t kissed her all morning.” (pg
53) here he is at first distracted or driven by his basic sense of hunger but
then jumps at the thought of Marie when she reminds him of her existence. So we
see him constantly being drive by his most immediate sensory experience as
these are the things that are real to him. This also ties in the representation
of emotional love as something sexual. Meursault is constantly mentioning Marie’s
looks, and how he feels towards her based on sexual urges and physical actions
of love. “I felt her legs around mine and I wanted her” – because the sexual
feelings are real, they exist in that moment, so his love is based on immediate
physical sensations, hence the importance of sex.
Annoying
Women
Although not a main motif in this chapter, Meursault’s annoyance at
women also appears. “It annoyed me to have to explain things to them” (pg 56)
because to him (noting his absurdist outlook) the fact that Raymond had to go
to the doctors was not important – it has no great meaning or significance and
so to him, it is not necessary to be crying and needing comfort. It annoys him
because it is absurd that this woman should require comfort when there is no
‘good’ reason.
Post-colonialism
It is possible to read this chapter’s presentation of the Arabs from post-colonial
perspective. The Europeans colonized Algeria and so there is racial/cultural
tension between the Arabs and the French/Europeans. This is shown through what
is known as ‘colonial dialogue’ because the Arabs are ONLY ever referred to as
‘Arabs’ or “the Arabs” (pg 57). This generalization depicts a concept of ‘that
is all they are’ which is further shown by the minimal description of the Arabs
by Camus. Throughout the novel, Meursault always notices such detail in the way
that people look, but with the Arabs – there is little or no description
(especially of their faces which in other situations, Meursault paid so much
detail to). A post colonialist would not believe that Camus intended to convey
these ideas but would instead believe that, because Camus was living at a time
when colonial values were still extant in his society they would be
unconsciously reflected in his writing.
Worldly /
Sensory Detail – heat/external conditions
This is one of the key motifs within this chapter. These external
conditions portray the idea that some of our choices are not ours and that we
can be ‘victims of circumstance’. The sun, irritating, frustrating and
distracting Meursault is an example of the way in which these external
conditions can affect our choices and decisions which in fact turn out to be
not our own. “The sun was shining almost vertically onto the sand and the glare
from the sea was unbearable.” (pg 54) is the first time Meursault speaks of
these external conditions irritating him. As the chapter progresses, his attention
to detail increases and so does his need to escape the suffocation of the
external conditions (the sun mainly) hence on page 58 he says “There was still
the same dazzling red glare…my jaws tightened.” which is a perfect example of
how these natural, external conditions are affecting him.
Shortly after this he shoots the Arab but what is important is that the
shooting occurs by accident. “That was when everything shook. The sea swept
ashore a great breath of fire. The sky seemed to be splitting from end to end
and raining down sheets of flame. My whole being went tense and I tightened my
grip on the gun. The trigger gave…”, the trigger gave – as though it
happens by accident. It is as if all the heat and the sun joined forces against
Meursault, and made him do it. The point being, that the choice was out of his
control. Through this Camus is showing that ‘really real things, are what makes
things happen’ and that as humans, the existential illusion that we can have
control over our choices and that we can define ourselves through them is
nothing more than a comforting myth. The oppressing, suffocating heat is a
silly reason to justify a gunshot (indeed it is not a reason at all), but it is
so emphasized in this chapter because sometimes really have no control.
The
importance of sensory details is emphasised by the detailed descriptions of
nature that persist throughout the chapter. For example, “beach…covered with
yellowish rocks and brilliant white asphodels” P51, “A hard blue sky” and “villas
with green or white fences” Intense natural imagery is used by Camus to suggest
that natural constructs are fundamentally more ‘real’ or more ‘forceful’ than
human ones. Hence there is much use of natural imagery in this chapter as the
characters travel away from the city to the beach. This susceptibility to the
elements of nature perhaps foreshadows how, later, the sun will drive Meursault
to commit the murder. If the day wasn’t so hot and “stinging” his eyes like a
“fire” perhaps the murder would not have happened?
Meursault’s
Lack of Emotion and Focus on Basic Needs
“it was
like giving four sharp knocks at the door of unhappiness” Even though Meursault
may realise what he’s done is pointless and will cause him “unhappiness” there
is still a clinical way in which he uses the symbol of a door opening, to
represent his feelings, instead of describe them. He associates his feelings
with a solid thing, when emotions are in fact natural, intangible and
spontaneous.
“The
trigger gave, I felt the underside of the polished butt”. Instead of focusing
on emotion he chooses to again describe with great precision; the tangible, the
physical, what he sees on face value, rather than feel. This is perhaps why the
public feels disgust in Meursault, as he describes exact details of the ‘murder
weapon’ but cannot portray remorse, emotion or regret as he shoots, and kills a
person.
In contrast Meursault is clearly driven by his basic needs. The short
bluntness of
“I was very hungry” P53 and “I wanted her” P53 show
Meursault’s basic needs but what is missing is the emotional connection with
these things. Does being hungry make him happy or sad or frustrated? Meursault
as a character, lacks this emotional response.
The Vestiges
of Moral Values
This motif appears when Meursault takes the gun off Raymond on page 57.
The reason is because it would be fairer to “take him [the Arab] on hand to
hand”. This is one of the few signs we are given that Meursault has some similar
moral values to a ‘normal’ person but this may be merely because he has grown
up in the same world as the rest of us, and we are all sculpted by our society
and all the moral values that go with it. The reason for his sudden realization
that “He hasn’t said anything to you yet. It’d be unfair to shoot him.” (pg 57)
could just be because he has a ‘hangover, a vestige of old moral values’ and
the reason that it appears now is because the situation is serious, it involves
human life.
Death
The death
of the Arab at the end of this chapter balances nicely the death of Meursault’s
mother with which we began the chapter and perhaps foreshadows Meursault’s
death at the end of the novel. However, there is death imagery throughout, for
example “a face like a funeral” P49, Marie’s like to describe Meursault’s
expression when he wakes up. Ironically, this is incorrect as we know from the
first chapters that Meursault is unaffected by his mothers death and funeral,
so the tired, gruff face would not actually be Meursault’s ‘funeral face.’ The
fact that he is so unaffected and that his mother’s death but is more upset by
the brightness of the sun which ‘slapped him in the face’ perhaps foreshadows
how he will be judged for displaying no emotion
in court.
Imagery:
In this
chapter, most of the imagery revolves around heat and the external conditions
that affect Meursault. “All I could feel were the cymbals the sun was clashing
against my forehead and, indistinctly, the dazzling spear still leaping up off
the knife in front of me.” (pg 60) is an example of how Camus uses vivid
descriptions and imagery to depict the untamable spirit of nature and that as
humans, we are powerless to stop it. Through images of “burning” (pg 59) and
“anchored in an ocean of molten metal” (pg 59) Camus paints an intense picture,
creating a sense of our powerlessness. It should also be noted that in this
chapter, there is little or no imagery to depict emotions or internal
conditions – because to Camus these things are irrelevant, they are human
constructs. Whereas “a blade of light that leapt up off the sand, from…a piece
of broken glass” is real, they are natural constructs.
Characters:
In this
Chapter, Meursault is revealed to us in a new light. He continues his absurdist
attitude (although it may not be known to him) but he is affected by a hangover
of old moral beliefs. For the first time he revels evidence that he was indeed
brought up in our world and has been shaped by society when he does not believe
that it is fair to shoot the Arab when he has not yet said anything or done
anything. This vestige of moral beliefs provides an important insight into the
novel as it helps differentiate who he is now from who he will become later in
the novel when he has lost all of these vestiges and does not give in to
society.
We are
also introduced to Masson a “huge broad shouldered fellow” and his wife a “plump
and friendly little wife, who had a parisian accent”. Camus uses this husband
and wife couple and their life to suggest what Meursault’s own married life
could be like as Marie and Meursault are contemplating marriage. “his wife was
laughing with Marie…first time…I really thought I’d get married”. They are also
an example of routine behavior as they “eat lunch,” “drink wine” and his wife
“has a siesta (sleep)” during the day, showing the pointlessness of life but
the purpose people make for themselves by having a routine.
Setting:
The chapter
takes place in a variety of settings: in a house, on a bus, at the beach, in a
chalet, and a clearing. The most significant of these locations are the beach
and the clearing, which is where the majority of the chapter takes place. The
beach is significant because so much of the imagery of the heat and unstoppable
external conditions takes place there, as well as the first fight. The clearing
is where the shooting takes place and I do not think is significant for any
specific reason - it is merely the location at which the shooting took place.
No other location would be more or less appropriate which is very much an
absurdist point of view.
Narrative
Style/Structure:
The chapters’
style contains the usual lacking in emotion and the narrator of the chapter is
Meursault as. However, this chapter seems to present more emotion and confusion
as to the thoughts of Meursault and the effects his morals seem to be having on
his actions, as well as a great deal of emphasis placed on heat and external
conditions which is to exemplify the arbitrary nature of the universe and how
sometimes, we do not have control of our actions.
The first person
narrative is used throughout but not to add emotions or feelings, just to
simply state facts, e.g. “I was hungry” P53. Therefore the narration takes on a
“3rd person feel” as though Meursault is distanced, or an ‘Outsider’ even to
his own life and feelings. He is an observer with no need for an opinion.
The
chapter is chronological also, but circular in the way that the men encounter
the Arabs at the beginning, in the middle and then at the end of the chapter. Equally
this death in the middle of the novel echoes the death we began the novel with and
the one which we know will happen at the end of Part 2. The circular narration
could suggest the Absurdist myth of Sisyphus who was destined to push a rock up
a hill, and when he finished, to start again hence the circular feel of the
chapter.
Unity of
Part to Whole (Development)
Ultimately, Chapter 6 is very significant as Meursault kills an Arab and this
dictates his future. Not only is this a moment of high tension but it is a
crucial plot development which helps steer the novel towards the finale, where
Meursault is punished partly for his action but also for his lack of remorse.
The key section is the last page of the chapter (pg 60) because although
it doesn’t include all the motifs, it is such a significant event that I felt
that it was the most important passage in the chapter, and that it sums up
exactly what Camus is trying to convey to the reader within this chapter which
is the absurdist point that we are not always in control of our most defining
actions and that sometimes external conditions are in control. It also
foreshadows Meursault’s opinion towards the murder later in the novel.