Philip Villamor rethinks Albert Camusí famous rockíníroll parable.
The gods condemned Sisyphus to ceaselessly roll a rock to the top of a mountain. It is an unending sequence of events: he arduously pushes the rock up the mountain, the rock rolls back down, Sisyphus follows it back down and then begins the task again. Yet if one believes Albert Camus, Sisyphus must be imagined as happy nonetheless.
Camus tells his readers that there are different opinions as to how Sisyphus became the futile laborer of the underworld, so we may imagine Camus also being open to other interpretations of his absurd heroís state of mind after death. But Camusí own portrayal of this mythic mortal will not allow me to imagine Sisyphus as happy about rolling a rock up a hill for eternity.
First, the events that ended with the decree of the gods to seize Sisyphus and lead him forcibly back to the underworld and his rock does not reflect a man in love with struggle itself.
Near death, Sisyphus orders his wife to throw his body into the middle of the public square. She does. Upon awakening in the Underworld, Sisyphus strikes a deal with the gods. He obtains permission to return to Earth to chastise his wife for her obedience, as it was so contrary to human love. Camus accepts this stated motivation at face value, though the traditional interpretation of the story suggests we should not. Given his history, one might say that there was never any doubt that Sisyphus would break this deal. Camus says that once Sisyphus returns to the world, enjoys the water and sun, warm stones and the sea, he no longer wants to go back to the infernal darkness, and goes on the run from the gods. The popular assertion is that he never did want to return; he always had in mind his freedom and love of the beauty of the mortal world.
Nonetheless, he is eventually tracked down by Hermes, who forcibly leads him back to the underworld and then to his rock. Camus imagines an underworld where the gods are even more careless in dealing with Sisyphus than before: they allow him to push the rock unattended, watch it roll down, and trust that he is going to go back down after it to push it up again. Imagining this perfunctory punishment gives Camus the opportunity to ponder the pause of Sisyphus at the top of the mountain, and assert that his conscious decision to return to the struggle for its own sake makes him the absurd hero. Well, myths are made to breathe life into ideas, but, given the nature of Sisyphus, I imagine things a bit differently.
True, Sisyphus evidently had not gone about his life making things easy for himself: a certain levity in regard to the gods involved him in more than a few struggles before his final punishment. But the struggle itself was not the motivation for his behavior during his life on earth, or even in his brief stint in a relatively tolerable afterlife prior to his punishment.
I canít imagine Sisyphus loving the idea of the struggle. Therefore, if one imagines Sisyphus being punished with pushing a rock up a mountain, one also ought to imagine someone there to watch him do it, probably cracking a whip to make him race down after the rock instead of allowing him to ponder how he is stronger than the rock on the way back down. Then I imagine Sisyphus scheming on the way up as to how he will eventually bribe, blackmail or simply bewitch his guard into providing him with another opportunity to return to earth.
Above all else, Sisyphus loves the sunshine and the freedom
to come and go and do as he chooses. He is not about to be satisfied for one
moment, let alone happy, with the notion of unceasing effort. He would be
hopeful, as many of us are, of an opportunity to cease the struggle he sees no
good reason for, and some day to be at peace enjoying the beauty of Earth. Camus
would have us believe that Sisyphusís adopting an attitude of scorn can somehow
result in joy, because it is his scorn. But there is no triumph in accepting
such circumstances. Sisyphus wasnít satisfied with his first chance at an
afterlife, which didnít include pushing a giant rock up a mountain. How are we
to believe that he would so readily accept his fate now that he has been given
such a pointless task? No, the myth of Sisyphus teaches a higher fidelity which
celebrates the wonder of life and tells us to never gives up hope. In a
previous bout with the gods, he told the nymph
Like many a mortal, Sisyphus has hope. He has hope precisely because of the beauty and freedom he has had time to experience on earth, and has developed a belief (the truth of which does not matter) that, somehow, there must be a way to make the experience last forever. He will not accept, even if the gods themselves set out to persuade him, that heís not worthy of a higher destiny.
There is no shadow without light, and it is essential to know the light. The hopeful human says, ďNo. There are some things I will not accept. I am worth more, and life must be more than action for actionís sake.Ē The struggle toward the heights is not itself enough to fill a human heart. One must imagine Sisyphus hopeful, and more human.
© Philip villamor 2009
Philip Villamor is an administrator for an educational